Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40468601›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025

Progress in Pharmacogenomics Implementation in the United States: Barrier Erosion and Remaining Challenges.

D Max Smith, Michael P Douglas, Christina L Aquilante, Patricia A Deverka, Beth Devine, Henry M Dunnenberger, Philip E Empey, Daniel L Hertz, Andrew A Monte, Ann M Moyer and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

D Max SmithMedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-2936
Michael P DouglasDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8517-6678
Christina L AquilanteDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Patricia A DeverkaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Beth DevineComparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Scholl of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-6099
Henry M DunnenbergerMark R. Neaman Center for Personalized Medicine, Endeavor Health, Evanston, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-1713
Philip E EmpeyDepartment of Pharmacy & Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-2339
Daniel L HertzDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0501-1035
Andrew A MonteDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Ann M MoyerDivison of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2590-7218
Jai N PatelDivision of Cancer Pharmacology & Pharmacogenomics, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9845-3697
Victoria M PrattDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-5051
Loren SaulsberryDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0325-2329
Stuart A ScottDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-1864
Deepak VooraVA National Pharmacogenomics Program, Department of Veteran's Affairs, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0015-5179
Erica L WoodahlL.S. Skaggs Institute for Health Innovation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0413-4140
Michelle Whirl-CarrilloDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-9312
Akinyemi Oni-OrisanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-5543
Pharmacogenomics Global Research Network (PGRN) Publications Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barriers to incorporating pharmacogenetics into routine clinical practice in the United States are well documented. Initial surveys by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) in 2009 and 2010 identified barriers across four key domains that have hindered the widespread adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic testing. These are presented verbatim as: (i) absence of a definition of the processes required to interpret genotype information and to translate genetic information into clinical actions; (ii) need for recommended drug/gene pairs to implement clinically now; (iii) clinician resistance to consider pharmacogenetic information at the bedside; and (iv) concerns about test costs and reimbursement. Over time, many of these challenges have been overcome, and clinical pharmacogenetic testing has subsequently reached broader implementation. Despite this progress, several barriers remain that block further adoption. This narrative review used authors' expertise and experience to identify and describe current barriers to pharmacogenetic implementation across seven domains in the United States: equity and inclusion; guidelines and supporting evidence; regulatory agency oversight; payer coverage and insurance; availability of quality pharmacogenetic tests; electronic health records; and provider and patient education. Within each domain, it revisits past successes and challenges and explores remaining barriers. We also propose solutions to address ongoing challenges across these domains, including further expansion of recommendations beyond pharmacogenetic-specific guidelines, standards for designing clinical decision support tools, and broader pharmacogenetics education. Addressing these remaining obstacles directs work to enable broader adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic implementation to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic TestingHumansPrecision MedicineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40468601
PMCPMC12439016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.