ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Progress in Pharmacogenomics Implementation in the United States: Barrier Erosion and Remaining Challenges.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reframing the Landscape for Achieving Equitable Pharmacotherapy Health Outcomes: Introducing Pharmacogenequity.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Implementation of Rapid CYP2C19 Genotyping to Guide Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap Between Pharmacogenomic Discovery and Clinical Implementation: Insights from Selected Studies on Inter-Individual Variability in Drug Response.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Genetic and Social Determinants of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema: A Precision Medicine Health Equity Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The critical need to implement pharmacogenomics in public health services: Mexico in the global picture.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A call to action for pharmacogenomics stewardship in South Africa.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Genotyping of DPYD and UGT1A1 in Brazilian oncological patients: applying pharmacogenomics in an admixed population.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Association of a CCB-Related Pharmacogenomics-Guided Strategy with Blood Pressure Outcomes and Short-Term Safety in Chinese Patients with Hypertension: A Secondary Exploratory Analysis of Two Randomized Cohorts.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomics-Guided Treatment in Cardiovascular Disease: An Umbrella Review.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Integrated approaches to geriatric mental disorders: pathophysiology, interventions, and precision medicine horizons.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Practical guide to implementing pre-emptive pharmacogenetic screening in routine pediatric oncology care.PharmacogenomicsArticle
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Barriers to incorporating pharmacogenetics into routine clinical practice in the United States are well documented. Initial surveys by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) in 2009 and 2010 identified barriers across four key domains that have hindered the widespread adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic testing. These are presented verbatim as: (i) absence of a definition of the processes required to interpret genotype information and to translate genetic information into clinical actions; (ii) need for recommended drug/gene pairs to implement clinically now; (iii) clinician resistance to consider pharmacogenetic information at the bedside; and (iv) concerns about test costs and reimbursement. Over time, many of these challenges have been overcome, and clinical pharmacogenetic testing has subsequently reached broader implementation. Despite this progress, several barriers remain that block further adoption. This narrative review used authors' expertise and experience to identify and describe current barriers to pharmacogenetic implementation across seven domains in the United States: equity and inclusion; guidelines and supporting evidence; regulatory agency oversight; payer coverage and insurance; availability of quality pharmacogenetic tests; electronic health records; and provider and patient education. Within each domain, it revisits past successes and challenges and explores remaining barriers. We also propose solutions to address ongoing challenges across these domains, including further expansion of recommendations beyond pharmacogenetic-specific guidelines, standards for designing clinical decision support tools, and broader pharmacogenetics education. Addressing these remaining obstacles directs work to enable broader adoption of clinical pharmacogenetic implementation to ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.