Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40468580›Full record

ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2025

Peer-mentorship among people with lower limb amputations living in small communities.

Jessica R Trimble, Jessica M Jessamine, Ken Bettin, William C Miller, Julian B Sernik, Brodie M Sakakibara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica R TrimbleDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jessica M JessamineDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ken BettinPatient Research Partner, Cranbrook, British Columbia, Canada.
William C MillerDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Julian B SernikInterior Health Authority, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-1445-8557
Brodie M SakakibaraDepartment of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6400-0139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeer-mentorship, when a peer shares a connection to a group provides knowledge, empathy, and validation through the unique perspective of their lived experience of practical and social-emotional knowledge following disease or disability. However, there is a paucity of research on peer-mentorship among individuals with lower limb amputations particularly those who live in small communities. This study aimed to investigate peer-mentorship among individuals with lower limb amputations in small communities during pre-amputation procedures and adjustment to life post-amputation.

methodsQualitative description, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with peer-mentors or mentees who experienced lower limb amputation in a small community. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: One member of the research team was a person with lived experience, and another member of the research team was a clinician (orthopaedic surgeon). Both team members contributed to the study concept, design and analysis of the data and have read and approved the final manuscript. The team member with lived experience additionally supported participant recruitment.

resultsFour themes emerged: 'satisfying an unmet need' explores the desire to learn from others who have similar experiences living with lower limb amputation; 'improving independence' describes the unique guidance offered by peer-mentors for returning to daily activities; 'friendship' considers peer-mentors' therapeutic delivery including its long-lasting guidance and connection; 'advocating for support and resources' examines how peer-mentors fulfil supportive roles such as health-care navigation.

conclusionResults demonstrate peer-mentorship's role in improving independence and social support and providing advocacy during adjustment to lower limb amputation among people residing in small communities. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: People who have had their leg amputated need support programs. This is very true for people living in small communities. In this study, we talked to people who have had a leg amputated and who live in a small community. We wanted to know their thoughts about peer-support. Peer-support is when someone who has a leg amputation provides support to others who also have a leg amputation. We asked people: How did peer-support help you get ready for your amputation? How did peer-support help you after your amputation? People said that peers provided education and advice. People also talked about peers being a friend. Overall, peer-support was helpful.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalAmputeesMentorsOccupational TherapyPeer GroupAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial Supportactivities of daily livingamputationsparticipationpsychosocialrecoveryrehabilitationrural health care

Identifiers

PMID40468580
PMCPMC12138234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.