ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
In vivo evaluation of population-specific inversion pulses in parallel transmission.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 10.5 T In Vivo Head Imaging With Universal RF Shimming.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- In vivo evaluation of population-specific inversion pulses in parallel transmission.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the study was to conduct in vivo evaluation of population-specific pulses in the context of the MP2RAGE sequence for brain imaging at 7T.
methodsFive clusters were identified in a cohort of 39 volunteers. One cluster centered around the average head shape and position, whereas four others were located toward the extremes of the population distribution. Additionally, the one-size-fits-all solution was considered, using a standard universal pulse (UP) approach. Head shapes were characterized using lateral head breadth (HB), anterior-posterior head length (HL), and Y-shift metrics. For each group, a 5kT-points universal inversion pulse was computed and evaluated on four new test anatomies. A Python pipeline was integrated into the image reconstruction routine, using localizer scans to classify head shapes and positions. The pipeline selected one of five precomputed population-specific pulses or defaulted to the generic UP without extending scan time.
resultsThe pipeline accurately classified head shapes and selected suitable pulses, enhancing the contrast of MP2RAGE images. Population-specific pulses helped mitigate some of the performance loss associated with using a one-size-fits-all UP, bringing performance closer to that of fully tailored solutions. This approach was particularly beneficial for individuals with smaller head sizes. However, the performance was worse in larger, more challenging head shapes.
conclusionThe novel head clustering and pulse selection pipeline facilitates the implementation of population-specific pulses in clinical practice by allowing pulse selection tailored to each head shape and position without increasing scan time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.