ArticleEuropean journal of oral sciences2025
Effect of different kinematics and perforation diameter on integrated electronic apex locator accuracy in detecting root canal perforations.
Article in European journal of oral sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of different kinematics and perforation diameter on integrated electronic apex locator accuracy in detecting root canal perforations.European journal of oral sciences · 2025Article
- Nonsurgical Management of Simultaneous Double Lateral Root Perforations in Adjacent Teeth Using CBCT and MTA: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the precision and reliability of the integrated electronic apex locator in determining various root perforation diameters and to examine the impact of instrumentation kinematics on perforation site detection. One hundred extracted single-root mandibular premolars were artificially perforated at five distinct diameters (0.25-1.25 mm), located 5 mm above the root apex. The teeth were then divided into 10 groups based on perforation size and kinematic subgroup (rotary, reciprocation; n = 10/subgroup). Actual distances to the perforation site (actual length) were measured under a dental operating microscope. Electronic distances (electronic length) were determined using an endodontic motor with an integrated electronic apex locator using rotary or reciprocating instrumentation kinematics during root canal treatment. To quantify the actual length to the electronic length discrepancies, individual tooth measurements were compared. The integrated electronic apex locator failed to identify perforations ≤ 0.50 mm in diameter. Electronic length measurements were similarly accurate for 1.00 and 1.25 mm perforations but more precise than for 0.75 mm perforations. Instrumentation kinematics did not affect the electronic length measurement accuracy. Integrated electronic apex locators failed to detect small perforations during root canal treatment. The perforation diameter influenced the detection accuracy of integrated electronic apex locators, whereas kinematics had no effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.