Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40468476›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025

ShimNet: A Neural Network for Postacquisition Improvement of NMR Spectra Distorted by Magnetic-Field Inhomogeneity.

Sylwia Jopa, Marek Bukowicki, Alexandra Shchukina, Krzysztof Kazimierczuk

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sylwia JopaCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2C, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Marek BukowickiCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2C, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Alexandra ShchukinaFaculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof KazimierczukCentre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2C, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9585-1737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite commonly applied corrections, known as shimming, the magnetic field in an NMR spectrometer is never perfectly homogeneous. This undesired effect distorts the lineshapes, degrades the resolution, and lowers the signal-to-noise ratio in the collected spectra. As a remedy, numerical techniques have been developed to correct the spectra after acquisition, with reference deconvolution being the most popular example. However, these methods require a precarious parameter guess from the user, making them inconvenient and prone to errors. In particular, the imperfections of the reference deconvolution manifest themselves as strong oscillations at the spectral baseline. We propose a postacquisition shimming tool named ShimNet based on a convolutional neural network with the attention mechanism. The model learns the distortion characteristics of a given spectrometer from a series of calibration measurements. Once trained, it can correct any spectrum from the same machine in a fully automatic way. It achieves slightly better reconstruction quality than the existing methods and is considerably faster. This makes ShimNet an excellent tool for laboratories performing routine and massive NMR measurements for chemists. As an exemplary application, we demonstrate that the model properly corrects liquid-state spectra of small molecules, such as azarone, styrene, Cresol Red, or sodium butyrate. The open-source Python code is freely available from https://github.com/center4ml/shimnet and as the web service at https://huggingface.co/spaces/NMR-CeNT-UW/ShimNet.

Identifiers

PMID40468476
PMCPMC12183756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.