Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40468391›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2025

Effect of vaccination against bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in a calf rearing unit in Finland.

Katja Mustonen, Heidi Härtel, Heli Simojoki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katja MustonenDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Paroninkuja 20, Saarentaus, FI-04920, Finland. katja.m.mustonen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5691-2753
Heidi HärtelHKFoods Finland Oy, PL 50, Turku, FI-20521, Finland.
Heli SimojokiDepartment of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Paroninkuja 20, Saarentaus, FI-04920, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) is the main health concern in calf-rearing units. It is a major cause of increased antibiotic use and the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in calves. Vaccination protocols against BRD for calf-rearing units are difficult to implement in practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the vaccination protocol including intranasal and subcutaneous vaccinations on mortality, antibiotic treatment rate, and average daily gain (ADG). The vaccination protocol consisted of intranasal BRD vaccination when the calves arrived at the rearing unit at the age of two to four weeks and two subcutaneous BRD vaccinations at two and three months of age. Mortality, antibiotic treatments, and ADG were recorded and evaluated from arrival until six months of age. The batches that arrived at the rearing unit prior to the beginning of the trial were used as the historic control group. Altogether, 740 vaccinated and 914 unvaccinated calves were enrolled to the study. A total of 88 calves (5.3%) died or were euthanized during the study period, of which 29 (32.9%) were vaccinated and 59 (67.1%) unvaccinated. In the logistic mixed model, the vaccination protocol decreased mortality (odds ratio 0.57, P = 0.036). The deaths occurred mostly during the pre-weaning period and only six calves died after weaning. During the study period, 1592 (96.3%) of the calves were treated with antibiotics at least once. In 90% of the courses, respiratory infections were the cause of antibiotic therapy. The mean antibiotic treatment rate for vaccinated calves (2.3 courses/calf, standard deviation [SD] 1.2) was lower than unvaccinated calves (2.4 courses/calf, SD 1.3) (P = 0.003). The average daily weight gain during the entire study period did not differ between the groups (vaccinated calves 1.08 kg/d, SD 0.12; unvaccinated calves 1.09 kg/d, SD 0.13). The vaccination protocol used in this study decreased the odds ratio for mortality but did not affect ADG. The difference in number of antibiotic treatments used for BRD was clinically negligible. A limitation of the study design is the interpretation of the effect of the historical control group which may affect the results through seasonal variation.

Indexed as

Bacterial VaccinesBovine Respiratory Disease ComplexCattle DiseasesVaccinationAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleFinlandMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial VaccinesAntimicrobial treatmentBovine respiratory diseaseBRDMorbidity

Identifiers

PMID40468391
PMCPMC12135499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.