Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40468387›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Resilience in Stroke survivor-care-partner Dyads (ReStoreD): a study protocol for a randomized-control trial.

Alexandra L Terrill, Sasha Gordon, Catharine Sparks, Brian B Baucom, Beth Cardell, Justin J MacKenzie, Jennifer J Majersik, Maija Reblin, Lorie G Richards

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandra L TerrillUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. alex.terrill@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2698-7435
Sasha GordonUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Catharine SparksUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Brian B BaucomUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Beth CardellUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Justin J MacKenziePrivate practice, St. George, UT, USA.
Jennifer J MajersikUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Maija ReblinUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Lorie G RichardsUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at University of UtahUM1TR004409 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RACHEL HESS, Jennifer Juhl Majersik · 2023 to 2026
$21.9M
Testing efficacy of an intervention to promote Resilience in Stroke survivor-carepartner Dyads (ReStoreD)R01HD105718 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TERRILL, ALEXANDRA · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research R01-HD105718NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004409NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD105718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of stroke is shared between the stroke survivor and their care-partner. An estimated 30-50% of stroke survivors and their care-partners experience depression or anxiety that negatively affects rehabilitation outcomes and quality of life. Yet, interventions to support couples post-stroke are largely insufficient or inaccessible. A novel remotely delivered dyadic intervention to promote Resilience in Stroke survivor-care-partner Dyads (ReStoreD) was developed to address this need. The intervention includes psychoeducation and weekly modules that help couples learn and practice goal-setting, communication strategies, and positive psychology activities like expressing gratitude, finding meaning, and fostering connections. The purpose of this study is to conduct an efficacy trial of the 8-week ReStoreD intervention with a sample of 200 dyads (n = 400) consisting of one individual who has sustained an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke between 3 months and 3 years prior to enrollment and a cohabitating partner.

methodsUsing a fully powered, randomized waitlist-control design, the efficacy of ReStoreD to reduce emotional distress in both dyad members will be determined (Aim 1). In addition, the effects of ReStoreD on secondary outcomes (resilience, relationship quality, stress-related stroke, meaningful activity engagement) as potential mediators (Aim 2) and moderators to determine whether certain subgroups respond better to the intervention (Aim 3) will be examined. All participants will complete standardized, validated assessments at baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 6-month follow-up. All aspects of the study, including intervention activities and assessments, are conducted remotely, online. DISCUSSION: This is the first rigorously designed efficacy trial to test a positive psychology intervention for stroke survivors and their care-partners. When the aims of this study are realized, there will be (1) a remotely delivered, dyadic intervention to support couples post-stroke; (2) a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the intervention's effect on emotional distress, which can inform future interventions; and (3) the ability to identify a more specific target population for whom the intervention works best. Ultimately, if found efficacious, this intervention will offer sustainable and accessible support for couples who are coping with stroke to improve rehabilitation outcomes and quality of life.

trial registrationThis trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov at NCT#04845542. Registered on April 13, 2021.

Indexed as

CaregiversResilience, PsychologicalSpousesStrokeStroke RehabilitationSurvivorsFemaleHumansMalePsychological DistressQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCaregiversDyadic interventionMental healthPost-stroke depressionQuality of lifeRandomized control trialResilienceStrokeStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID40468387
PMCPMC12139354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.