ArticleHead & face medicine2025
Machine learning in dentistry and oral surgery: charting the course with bibliometric insights.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Dentistry and Public Health Surveillance: Opportunities and Challenges.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Exploring the landscape of artificial intelligence in dental and maxillofacial radiology: a bibliometric analysis of studies and trends.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Mapping Artificial Intelligence Research in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Digital Intelligence in Dental Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to comprehensively analyze the application of machine learning (ML) in dentistry and oral surgery using bibliometric methods to identify research trends, hotspots, and future directions.
methodsPublications related to ML in dentistry and oral surgery published between 2010 and 2024 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded by the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). A total of 2234 unique publications were identified after screening. Bibliometric analysis was performed using the VOSviewer and CiteSpace software, focusing on parameters such as the number of publications, countries, institutions, journals, co-cited references, and keyword bursts.
resultsThe number of publications increased significantly from 2018 to 2024. China and the United States were the leading countries in terms of number of publications and citation counts. Prominent institutions include Seoul National University, Sichuan University, and Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Journals such as BMC Oral Health and the Journal of Dentistry have a large number of publications. Analysis of the co-cited references revealed clusters related to disease diagnosis and risk prediction, treatment planning, clinical decision support systems, and dental education. Keyword bursts indicate the evolution of research focus from traditional machine learning algorithms to deep learning algorithms and the emerging importance of multimodal data and foundation models.
conclusionML has made remarkable progress in dentistry and oral surgery. Although clinicians can benefit from the application of ML models in their practice, they should conduct comprehensive clinical validations to ensure the accuracy and reliability of these models. Moreover, challenges, such as data availability and security, algorithmic biases, and "black-box models", must be addressed. Future research should focus on integrating multimodal data and leveraging foundation models to improve the accuracy of diagnosis, treatment planning, and educational tools in dentistry and oral surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.