ArticleParasites & vectors2025
Experimental evidence rules out mosquitoes as vectors of Lyme disease.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of potential biomarkers for Lyme disease using bioinformatics and machine learning.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLyme disease, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), is the most common vector-borne disease in the Northern Hemisphere, with Ixodes ticks as its primary vectors. However, many patients do not recall tick bites, fueling speculation about alternative transmission routes, particularly via mosquito bites. This belief is reinforced by studies reporting Borrelia presence in mosquitoes. This study evaluates whether three mosquito species can acquire, maintain, and transmit Borrelia spirochetes.
methodsMosquitoes (Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Culex pipiens biotype molestus) were fed on Borrelia-infected mice to assess pathogen acquisition. Additional experiments involved ex vivo feeding on Borrelia-enriched blood to examine spirochete persistence in the mosquito gut. The potential for mechanical transmission was tested by simulating interrupted feeding between infected and naive hosts. The role of trypsin in Borrelia survival and infectivity was also investigated.
resultsMosquitoes exhibited low efficiency in acquiring Borrelia from infected hosts. Spirochetes artificially introduced through ex vivo blood meals were rapidly eliminated during digestion, primarily due to trypsin activity. Inhibition of trypsin prolonged spirochete persistence and infectivity in the mosquito gut. Mechanical transmission experiments revealed no evidence of Borrelia transmission from infected to naive hosts.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that mosquitoes lack the biological capacity to efficiently acquire and maintain B. burgdorferi s.l. spirochetes and are unable to transmit them through natural or mechanical means. This study provides compelling evidence against mosquito-borne transmission of Lyme disease and reinforces Ixodes ticks as the sole competent vectors, which is crucial for targeted public health interventions and accurate risk communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.