ArticleJournal of biological engineering2025
Material and biological characterization of 3D knitted bioresorbable poly (D,L-lactide) (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds for soft tissue regeneration: from fabrication to in vivo performance.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced antibacterial wound management: comparative study of non-antibiotic drug elution and nanoparticle integration.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Lignocellulose degradation characteristics and mechanisms of raw and NaOH-pretreated wheat straw by Irpex lacteus QJ: multi-omics analysis.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
- Biological and Biophysical Characterization of Hybrid PLCL Nanofibers Incorporating Stem Cell-Derived Secretome.Polymers · 2026Article
- Electrospinning PLLA/PCL Blend Fibre-Based Materials and Their Biomedical Application: A Mini Review.Polymers · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSoft-tissue reconstruction is crucial in fields such as plastic surgery and oncology to address the repair of damaged tissues. Knitted scaffolds from bioresorbable copolymers, specifically poly(D,L-lactide) (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL), offer mechanical and biological properties that are essential for tissue engineering. This study assessed three-dimensional knitted scaffolds fabricated from melt-spun PLA and PCL multifilaments for soft tissue engineering applications. It examined the impact of the PLA/PCL ratio on the knitted scaffold structure, mechanical properties, and biological responses to determine the optimal composition for adipose tissue reconstruction.
resultsKnitted scaffolds fabricated with the PLA/PCL blends (PLA
conclusionPLA/PCL knitted scaffolds offer a promising solution for enhancing graft volume maintenance and improving long-term outcomes, with tunable mechanical properties and biodegradability. The PLA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.