ArticleBMC nursing2025
Nurse leader perspectives of organisational capacity for higher education: implications for nursing education policy.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe location of nursing education in higher education is a global change initiative that intends to achieve an improved, highly qualified nursing workforce to enhance professional status in line with other health professions. Organisational capacity has become an emerging research interest and a critical success factor in change initiatives as nursing colleges strive to align with international trends and national accreditation standards. The aim of the study was to determine nurse leaders' perspectives on the capacity of public nursing colleges for programme accreditation against higher education criteria and standards.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used. Data were collected from 88 nurse leaders in urban, rural, and mixed provincial nursing colleges across three South African provinces using the Higher Education Diagnostic Indicator of Readiness and Capacity to Change scale. Descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, and inter-item reliability were applied in data analysis and instrument testing.
resultsOrganisational diagnostics revealed weaknesses in human resources, technology, infrastructure, and research capacity amid well-grounded strategies for student recruitment and teaching and learning, and appropriate staff qualifications and experience. Staff shortages, research limitations, inadequate infrastructure, including outdated facilities and limited information technology resources were prevalent, falling below higher education standards.
conclusionDiagnosing organisational capacity for change provides an empirical basis for a deeper understanding of the status of nursing colleges as functional higher education organisations. The perspectives of nurse leaders highlight critical areas to be addressed, which include key policy pillars for staffing, infrastructure resources, and ongoing professional development. Strengthening policy support for nursing college education is crucial for producing highly skilled nurses capable of meeting the evolving demands of modern healthcare systems. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.