ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Advancing blood cell detection and classification: performance evaluation of modern deep learning models.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection and classification of blood cells are important in diagnosing and monitoring a variety of blood-related illnesses, such as anemia, leukemia, and infection, all of which may cause significant mortality. Accurate blood cell identification has a high clinical relevance in these patients because this would help to prevent false-negative diagnosis and to treat them in a timely and effective manner, thus reducing their clinical impacts.Our research aims to automate the process and eliminate manual efforts in blood cell counting. While our primary focus is on detection and classification, the output generated by our approach can be useful for disease prediction. This follows a two-step approach, where YOLO-based detection is first performed to locate blood cells, followed by classification using a hybrid CNN model to ensure accurate identification. We conducted a thorough and extensive comparison with other state-of-the-art models, including MobileNetV2, ShuffleNetV2, and DarkNet, for blood cell detection and classification. In terms of real-time performance, YOLOv10 outperforms other object detection models with better detection rates and classification accuracy. But MobileNetV2 and ShuffleNetV2 are more computationally efficient, which becomes more appropriate for resource-constrained environments. In contrast, DarkNet outperformed in terms of feature extraction performance, and the fine blood cell type classification. Additionally, an annotated blood cell data set was generated for this study. A diverse set of blood cell images with fine-grained annotations is contained in this dataset to make it useful for deep learning models training and evaluation. Because the present dataset will be an important resource for researchers and developers working on automatic blood cell detection and classification systems, we will make it publicly available under the open-access nature in order to accelerate the collaboration and progress in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.