ArticleBMC biology2025
Comparative macrogenomics reveal plateau adaptation of gut microbiome in cervids.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomic insights into the global wild boar faecal microbiome reveal novel taxa and carbohydrate degraders distinguishing wild and domesticated Sus.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Genome-resolved analysis of colonization factor repertoires reveals ecological stratification in cervid gut microbiomes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Gut Morphological Structure-Microbial Characteristics inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Microbiota-Metabolite-Host Crosstalk Mediates the Impact of Dietary Energy Levels on Colonic Homeostasis in High-Altitude Ruminants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Variations in the Fecal Microbiota of Red Deer in Relation to the Hunting Area in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region, Italy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiverse gut microbiota in animals significantly influences host physiology, ecological adaptation, and evolution. However, the specific functional roles of gut microbiota in facilitating host adaptation, as well as the coevolutionary dynamics between microbiota and their hosts, remain largely understudied.
resultsA total of 41,847 metagenome-assembled genomes and 3193 high-quality species-level genome bins were generated, establishing a comprehensive gut microbiome catalog for cervids in this study. Phylogenetic analysis revealed a coevolutionary relationship between cervids and their gut microbiota. Comparative metagenomic analyses further indicated that the gut microbiota of plateau cervids have undergone genome-level adaptations related to energy metabolism. At the genus level, species-level genome bins from the genera Alistipes and Faecousia in plateau cervids exhibit enhanced energy metabolism capabilities. Structural variations analysis revealed that the insertion and duplications structural variations in the gut microbiota of plateau cervids were significantly enriched in energy metabolism pathways. In contrast, the deletions and contractions in structural variations were predominantly enriched with metabolic pathways involved in the biosynthesis of diverse biochemical molecules.
conclusionsOur study provides a comprehensive gut microbiome catalog of the cervid gut microbiota, revealing the coevolutionary relationship between cervid gut microbiota and hosts. These findings highlight the adaptive genomic evolution of the gut microbiota in contributing to the plateau adaptability of cervids and offer new insights into the mechanisms by which the gut microbiota help hosts adapt to extreme environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.