ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Trends in the causes of stillbirths over 20 years in Southern Japan.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to determine the temporal trend in the causes of stillbirths over a period of two decades using a regional perinatal database in order to facilitate the development of perinatal strategies to prevent stillbirths in Japan.
methodsThis was a population-based retrospective study. Cases of perinatal death and neurological damage were reported by perinatal centers and primary birth clinics, followed by their peer review and audit, and final registration in the database. Data for stillbirths, defined as fetal death at ≥ 22 weeks of gestation between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2020, were extracted from the database. Causes of stillbirths were reclassified according to the ReCoDe system. Temporal trends in the causes of stillbirths per 1,000 births and proportion of the causes were evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage test.
resultsOver the 20 years, in the study region, a total of 205,025 were delivered at ≥ 22 weeks of gestation, and 569 were stillborn (2.8 per 1,000 births). The most common cause of stillbirth was "no relevant condition identified" in 39.5% cases, followed by "abruption" in 12.3%, "lethal congenital anomaly" in 9.5%, and "umbilical cord, other" in 5.8%. The trends in stillbirths caused by "fetal growth restriction," "abruption," "asphyxia," and "no relevant condition identified" significantly decreased. However, no change in trend due to "lethal congenital anomaly" was seen. The stillbirth trend caused by "cord, other" significantly increased. The proportion of stillbirths related to unidentified causes remained unchanged.
conclusionsOver the 20-year period, the rate of stillbirths caused by abruption, fetal growth restriction, and asphyxia, which can be reduced by early detection and intervention, decreased. The incidence of stillbirths caused by cord constriction increased. Investigations to prevent cord-accident stillbirths would be required to further reduce stillbirths in the study region. Establishment of algorithms that allow the identification of the causes of stillbirths would be crucial to reduce instances of stillbirths due to unidentified causes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.