SynthesisWorld journal of urology2025
The incidence and influencing factors of hypothermia in patients after transurethral prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative effects of remimazolam and propofol on intraoperative redistribution hypothermia in urologic surgery: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInadvertent perioperative hypothermia prevalence and its risk factors in Transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) vary partly due to definition criteria.
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to identify the prevalence and risk factors of Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in TURP patients.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database, and Weipu Database were searched through December 31st, 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Literature published in English or Chinese reporting factors influencing IPH in TURP patients was eligible for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data Extraction and Synthesis Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Continuous variables were analysed using 95% CI. Categorical variables were analysed using OR and 95% CI.
resultsTURP patients with Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia were compared to those without Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia for haemorrhage, age, temperature of the rinsing solution and operation time. The current meta-analysis included 10 studies, with a total of 2,668 patients.The overall Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia prevalence was 29%. The meta-analysis and systematic review showed that haemorrhage (OR: 2.05 [1.97-2.13], P < 0.00001) and age (OR: 1.05 [1.02-1.08], P = 0.0002) were Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia risk factors for Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in TURP patients. In contrast, no significant relationship was observed between Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia and temperature of the rinsing solution and operation time. The researchers should do early and regular screening, the whole process of managing high-risk groups, and formulating targeted measures according to risk factors for precise prevention.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis indicated that haemorrhage and age might be associated with a greater risk of IPH in TURP patients. Associations between Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia and temperature of the rinsing solution and operation time require further investigation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024619217.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.