ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
From practice to perfection-complications and operative time learning curves in benign robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic versus open (or laparoscopic) hysterectomy: a comprehensive review of clinical, surgical, and economic outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Robotic hysterectomy and hospital performance: nationwide evidence on outcomes, efficiency, and costs in France (2020 to 2024).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Perceived learning curve of the nursing team using the da vinci XI surgical system in a Brazilian university hospital.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Beyond Pathology: A Procedure-Based Approach to Planning and Predicting Outcomes in Robotic Gynaecological Oncology Surgery.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor "From practice to perfection-complications and operative time learning curves in benign robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to estimate the learning curve for benign robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, defined as the number of cases required to stabilize intra- and postoperative complications, estimated blood loss and operative time. This is a retrospective single-center cohort study with prospectively collected data. Patients who underwent a robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy between 2013 and 2021 were included. Six surgeons performed the surgeries. Analysis was conducted using linear and logistic generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression. The estimand was change in the speed of learning. The cohort comprised 1281 consecutive cases. An inverse association was observed between the number of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomies and the number of complications with a breakpoint at 150 surgeries (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 0.996, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.992-0.999, P = 0.03) This decrease continued with surgeon experience. Moreover, there was a significant decrease in operative time after 50 operations (aCoeff -0.62 min, 95% CI - 0.89 to - 0.34 min, P < 0.001), with an operative time of approximately 100 min. No significant difference in intraoperative blood loss was observed throughout the learning curve (Knotbreak 50 operations, aCoeff 0.69 ml, 95% CI - 0.44 - 1.81 ml, P = 0.23). In this large observational study of learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, a plateau was reached at 50 cases for operative time and 150 cases for intra- and postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.