ArticleCalcified tissue international2025
Patterns of Bone Mineral Density Loss at Multiple Skeletal Sites Following Recent Menopause in Users and Non-Users of Menopausal Hormone Therapy.
Article in Calcified tissue international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Later menopause confers no additional protection against osteoporosis in older women.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Sex and age specific bone mineral density trends in Sri Lankan adults support the need for normative reference data.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Post-menopausal bone loss has been well described, however fewer studies have focussed on changes around the time of menopause. This study describes bone mineral density (BMD) loss following recent menopause, stratified by hormone replacement therapy (HT) use. Women (n = 287) who self-reported recent menopause (≥ 12 months to < 5 yr since last menstrual period) for at least one assessment phase of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were included. BMD was measured using Lunar DPX-L and GE-Prodigy machines. Time since menopause was calculated for each participant at each assessment phase and divided into three categories: < 5 yr, 5-10 yr and ≥ 10 yr. BMD loss was expressed as: (i) cumulative loss over time, (ii) absolute value per year and (iii) percentage loss per year. Proportions of women with normal BMD, osteopenia and osteoporosis were also calculated. Cumulative BMD loss was lower among HT users than non-users at all sites and time categories, except the femoral neck. Compared to the other time categories, HT non-users had a greater rate of BMD loss (expressed as an absolute value or percentage per year) during the first five years postmenopause at the ultra-distal forearm and lumbar spine. No differences were observed between the time categories for HT users. The proportions of women with osteopenia and osteoporosis increased across each of the time categories, but patterns differed by skeletal site, being more pronounced for the femoral neck and mid-forearm sites. Rates of bone loss were greater at the lumbar spine and ultra-distal forearm during the first five years following menopause.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.