ReviewNature protocols2026
Multiplexed single-molecule characterization at the library scale.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-molecule techniques are exceptionally well suited for analyzing the complex dynamic behavior of macromolecules involved in fundamental biological processes. Nevertheless, time and cost usually restrict current single-molecule methods to examining a limited number of different samples. At the same time, a broad sequence or chemical space often needs to be investigated to gain a thorough understanding of complex biological phenomena. To address this urgent need, we have developed multiplexed single-molecule characterization at the library scale (MUSCLE), a method that combines single-molecule fluorescence microscopy with next-generation sequencing to enable highly multiplexed observations of complex dynamics on millions of individual molecules spanning thousands of distinct sequences or barcoded entities. In this protocol, we outline the implementation of MUSCLE and present examples from our recent research, such as the sequence-dependent dynamics of Cas9-induced target DNA unwinding and rewinding. This example demonstrates that MUSCLE can be applied to study protein-nucleic acid interactions, going beyond nucleic-acid-only model systems. We detail the sample and library design, high-throughput single-molecule data acquisition, next-generation sequencing, spatial registration of single-molecule fluorescence and sequencing data and downstream data analysis. The ligation-based surface immobilization approach of MUSCLE ensures high clustering efficiency (>40%), increasing throughput and simplifying registration. In addition, MUSCLE includes a 3D-printed flow cell adapter that enables liquid exchange during single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. The complete procedure typically spans 3-4 days and yields a dataset that comprehensively characterizes the dynamic behavior of a library of constructs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40468024What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.