ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2025
Individual risk stratification to predict metastasis for ESD of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study was aimed at identifying histopathological risk factors for metastasis and developing a reliable risk stratification system for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (sESCC) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
methodsThree hundred and thirty-one patients who underwent ESD from January 2009 to December 2019 and were pathologically confirmed as mucosal or submucosal cancer were included. Their clinicopathological characteristics were reviewed.
resultsThe median follow-up period was 51 months (range 12-132 months). We found 42 patients had recurrence, 16 metastasized (1 distant metastasis, 13 lymph node metastasis, 2 both distant and lymph node metastasis), and 24 patients died. This univariate analysis revealed five morphological features were significantly associated with metastasis and overall survival. They were invasive depth, tumor budding, differentiation, infiltrative growth pattern, and vessel invasion (P < 0.05). Vessel invasion (HR 3.635, 95% CI 1.063-12.435) was confirmed with multivariate analysis as independent risk factor for metastasis. The five factors were included in the risk stratification system and assigned scores (0-5). According to the 5-year non-metastasis rate, all cases were re-classed into a group of 293 low-risk tumors, and a group of 38 high-risk tumors. Our data revealed the metastasis rates of patients in high-risk group were significantly higher than those in low-risk group (P < 0.001).
conclusionsBased on histopathological characteristics of ESD specimens, we developed a risk stratification system, which significantly divided sESCC into low-risk and high-risk group for metastasis. This may be used to assist in the decision-making process of sESCC to determine who need additional therapy after ESD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40467993What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.