ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Dual-wavelength (980/1470 nm) laser incisions in porcine colon tissue: a histological in vitro study.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the effects of a new dual-wavelength laser (980-nm and 1470-nm) on intestinal tissue incisions. The 980-nm laser efficiently absorbs hemoglobin and water, while the 1470-nm laser excels in water absorption. Therefore, these wavelengths offer significant advantages for tissue cutting and coagulation. Although dual-wavelength lasers are used in urology and gynecology, their application in colorectal surgery remains undocumented. Fresh porcine colon tissue was secured to a custom-designed X-axis mobile platform equipped with computer-controlled electric stepper motors. A dual-wavelength laser system, mounted on this platform, traversed linearly at a velocity of 2 mm/s, maintaining the working tip at a 90° angle relative to the tissue surface. A total of thirty-five tissue specimens were collected for each experimental group (980-nm laser, 1470-nm laser, and a combination of 980/1470-nm lasers in a 1: 1 power mode) and subsequently compared to specimens treated with a high-frequency electric knife. Histological analysis was conducted following Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining. The application of ANOVA for data following a normal distribution or the utilization of non-parametric tests for data that do not conform to a normal distribution. Complete penetration of the colon is characterized by the longitudinal section penetration of the mucosal, submucosal, muscular, and serous layers of intestinal tissue, as observed in hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained sections. This level of penetration was achieved at 72 W using a 980-nm laser, at 50 W with a 1470-nm laser, and at 6:6 W with a dual-wavelength laser. The dual-wavelength laser demonstrated enhanced cutting efficiency and reduced thermal damage compared to the single-wavelength 980-nm and 1470-nm lasers. Furthermore, it provided superior cutting efficiency, with no significant differences observed in the maximun depth of thermal injury relative to conventional electrosurgical devices. The 980/1470-nm dual-wavelength laser system offers substantial benefits in colorectal surgery, facilitating a more precise and safer surgical technique. This system is distinguished by its enhanced cutting efficiency and reduced thermal damage relative to single-wavelength 980-nm and 1470-nm lasers. Furthermore, when compared to high-frequency electrosurgical instruments, the dual-wavelength laser maintains superior cutting efficiency without an associated increase in thermal damage. Further studies will validate the efficacy and safety of 980/1470-nm dual-wavelength laser-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in a live pig colon model and apply them to the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40467989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.