Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467975›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025

Emerging technology in kidney transplantation: the single-port robot-assisted system.

Hakan Bahadir Haberal, Muhammet Irfan Donmez, Alicia López-Abad, Alessio Pecoraro, Alberto Piana, Beatriz Bañuelos Marco, Thomas Prudhomme, Angelo Territo, European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Kidney Transplantation Working Group

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hakan Bahadir HaberalDepartment of Urology, Ankara Ataturk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Ministry of Health, University of Health Sciences, 06290, Ankara, Turkey. bahadirhaberal@gmail.com.
Muhammet Irfan DonmezIstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Division of Pediatric Urology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Alicia López-AbadDepartment of Urology, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.
Alessio PecoraroUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Alberto PianaDepartment of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Beatriz Bañuelos MarcoDepartment of Urology, Renal Transplant Division, University Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Thomas PrudhommeDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Angelo TerritoUro-Oncology and Kidney Transplant Unit, Department of Urology at "Fundació Puigvert" Hospital, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Kidney Transplantation Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following its introduction into urologic surgery, the single-port (SP) robotic system has emerged as a promising tool also in kidney transplantation (KT). The feasibility and utility of SP for KT has been reported in a series of studies. With the aim of bringing out the currently available data on this subject, we conducted a literature review. After screening 213 reports, ten full-text articles were included in this review. Both preclinical and clinical studies have shown that the SP robotic system is an efficient tool for KT, kidney autotransplantation, donor nephrectomy, and ureteral reconstruction after KT, with low major complications rates. Current evidence suggests the potential benefits of the SP robotic system for KT and related procedures, particularly in terms of postoperative recovery and short-term functional outcomes. These benefits include reduced postoperative pain and earlier discharge, particularly with the extraperitoneal approach. However, the existing literature remains limited, comes only from specific centers and evidence on long-term outcomes is lacking. Therefore, further studies with larger sample sizes, extended follow-up, and comparative analyses of surgical approaches are needed.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansNephrectomyTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeKidney transplantationNephrectomyReimplantationRobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.