ArticleMedical physics2025
Deep learning-based cone-beam CT motion compensation with single-view temporal resolution.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A competition-proven deep learning-based dual-domain framework for low-dose CBCT reconstruction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Optimising Camera-ChArUco Geometry for Motion Compensation in Standing Equine CT: A CT-Motivated Benchtop Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based cone-beam CT motion compensation with single-view temporal resolution.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCone-beam CT (CBCT) scans that are affected by motion often require motion compensation to reduce artifacts or to reconstruct 4D (3D+time) representations of the patient. To do so, most existing strategies rely on some sort of gating strategy that sorts the acquired projections into motion bins. Subsequently, these bins can be reconstructed individually before further post-processing may be applied to improve image quality. While this concept is useful for periodic motion patterns, it fails in case of non-periodic motion as observed, for example, in irregularly breathing patients. PURPOSE: To address this issue and to increase temporal resolution, we propose the deep single angle-based motion compensation (SAMoCo).
methodsTo avoid gating, and therefore its downsides, the deep SAMoCo trains a U-net-like network to predict displacement vector fields (DVFs) representing the motion that occurred between any two given time points of the scan. To do so, 4D clinical CT scans are used to simulate 4D CBCT scans as well as the corresponding ground truth DVFs that map between the different motion states of the scan. The network is then trained to predict these DVFs as a function of the respective projection views and an initial 3D reconstruction. Once the network is trained, an arbitrary motion state corresponding to a certain projection view of the scan can be recovered by estimating DVFs from any other state or view and by considering them during reconstruction.
resultsApplied to 4D CBCT simulations of breathing patients, the deep SAMoCo provides high-quality reconstructions for periodic and non-periodic motion. Here, the deviations with respect to the ground truth are less than 27 HU on average, while respiratory motion, or the diaphragm position, can be resolved with an accuracy of about 0.75 mm. Similar results were obtained for real measurements where a high correlation with external motion monitoring signals could be observed, even in patients with highly irregular respiration.
conclusionsThe ability to estimate DVFs as a function of two arbitrary projection views and an initial 3D reconstruction makes deep SAMoCo applicable to arbitrary motion patterns with single-view temporal resolution. Therefore, the deep SAMoCo is particularly useful for cases with unsteady breathing, compensation of residual motion during a breath-hold scan, or scans with fast gantry rotation times in which the data acquisition only covers a very limited number of breathing cycles. Furthermore, not requiring gating signals may simplify the clinical workflow and reduces the time needed for patient preparation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.