ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based prediction of respiratory depression during sedation for liposuction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Procedural sedation is often performed by non-anesthesiologists in various settings and can lead to respiratory depression. A tool that enables early detection of respiratory compromise could not only enhance patient safety during procedural sedation, but also reduce the risk of medical liability. In this study, we aimed to develop a machine learning model that integrates detailed body composition data from patients undergoing liposuction to enhance the prediction of respiratory depression during procedural sedation. Features from bioelectrical impedance analysis, 3D body scanning, and manual measurements were extracted and used to train machine learning models. SHAP analysis, an explainable AI approach, was conducted to visually interpret feature importance. The XGBoost model, particularly when incorporating 3D body scanning data, demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.856 and a sensitivity of 0.805. The main predictors identified were upper abdominal volume, BMI, and age, highlighting the importance of the acquisition of detailed body composition data for assessing respiratory risks during sedation. The developed model effectively predicts the risk of respiratory depression in patients undergoing liposuction, offering a potential for personalized sedation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.