ArticleScientific reports2025
Weakly supervised learning through box annotations for pig instance segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pig instance segmentation is a critical component of smart pig farming, serving as the basis for advanced applications such as health monitoring and weight estimation. However, existing methods typically rely on large volumes of precisely labeled mask data, which are both difficult and costly to obtain, thereby limiting their scalability in real-world farming environments. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a novel approach that leverages simpler box annotations as supervisory information to train a pig instance segmentation network. In contrast to traditional methods, which depend on expensive mask annotations, our approach adopts a weakly supervised learning paradigm that reduces annotation cost. Specifically, we enhance the loss function of an existing weakly supervised instance segmentation model to better align with the requirements of pig instance segmentation. We conduct extensive experiments to compare the performance of the proposed method that only uses box annotations, with that of five fully supervised models requiring mask annotations and two weakly supervised baselines. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms all existing weakly supervised approaches and three out of five fully supervised models. Moreover, compared with fully supervised methods, our approach exhibits only a 3% performance gap in mask prediction. Given that annotating a box takes merely 26 seconds, whereas annotating a mask requires 94 seconds, this minor accuracy trade-off is practically negligible. These findings highlight the value of employing box annotations for pig instance segmentation, offering a more cost-effective and scalable alternative without compromising performance. Our work not only advances the field of pig instance segmentation but also provides a viable pathway to deploy smart farming technologies in resource-limited settings, thereby contributing to more efficient and sustainable agricultural practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.