ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Botulinum toxin in fracture management: a scoping review.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUsing botulinum toxin (BoNT) as an adjunct in fracture management is a novel approach with the potential to improve clinical outcomes, particularly in atypical fractures and patients with concurrent neuromuscular disorders. This scoping review explores the literature on BoNT's effectiveness in facilitating fracture healing and immobilisation across various fracture types.
methodsThe PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched with defined operators. Two investigators conducted independent searches, which were combined. Animal studies, case reports, case series, cohort reviews and randomised control trials were included.
resultsFifty studies were identified for screening, from which 15 studies were included in the review. The findings highlight mixed outcomes in BoNT's role in enhancing bone healing and reducing muscle-induced displacement. While BoNT injections demonstrated potential benefits in specific cases, such as atypical fractures, periprosthetic fractures and fractures in patients with motor dysfunctions, results from animal studies were inconsistent, showing varied effects on callous formation and bone mineral density.
conclusionClinical applications of BoNT in fracture management indicate its utility as an immobilisation agent to promote fracture healing and reduce complications. However, this review highlights that further research is necessary to bridge the gap between experimental and clinical studies and to clarify BoNT's effectiveness in different use cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.