Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467868›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026

Contemporary approaches and treatment perspectives for chronic scrotal content pain: insights from a national practice patterns survey of reproductive urologists.

Anthony Bettencourt, Bryan D Naelitz, Leila Momtazi-Mar, Amelia Khoei, Joseph Borrell, Jaxon R Jeffery, Thiago P Furtado, Catherine S Nam, Nahid Punjani, Scott D Lundy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Vasectomy reversal : Literature review].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Vasectomy revisited: Safe procedure in a changing reproductive landscape.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anthony BettencourtDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3256-7721
Bryan D NaelitzGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9268-3413
Leila Momtazi-MarCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1565-1151
Amelia KhoeiDepartment of Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Joseph BorrellDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Jaxon R JefferyMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, 85050, USA.
Thiago P FurtadoDivision of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Catherine S NamDepartment of Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Nahid PunjaniDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
Scott D LundyGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-4295
Sriram V EleswarapuDivision of Andrology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. SEleswarapu@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1852-4833
MOBYUS Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 25-item electronic survey was circulated to reproductive urologists from around the US to evaluate current national diagnostic and therapeutic practices for the management of chronic scrotal content pain (CSCP). Questions addressed physician demographics, referral patterns, diagnostic protocols, treatment approaches, and outcome perceptions. Forty-one of 183 (22.4%) invited participants completed the survey. Among ten conservative treatment options, reassurance (41.5%) and NSAIDs (31.7%) were most frequently ranked first, while opioid medications were the least preferred, with 56.1% of respondents ranking them last of the ten options. Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord was the most commonly utilized surgical procedure overall (95.1%) and the first choice for post-vasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS) in 63.0% of respondents. Vasectomy reversal was the surgery of choice for PVPS in only 22.0% of respondents. Respondents perceived higher complete symptom resolution (median: 75% vs. 25%) and lower failure rates (median: 10% vs. 20%) in patients who had surgery versus those who had only conservative measures. Only 7.3% of participants reported using validated assessment tools such as the Chronic Orchialgia Symptom Index. These results demonstrate that wide variability persists in CSCP management among reproductive urologists, though there is consensus that surgery has a higher success rate as compared to conservative management.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementPractice Patterns, Physicians'ScrotumAdultHumansMaleSpermatic CordSurveys and QuestionnairesUrologistsUrologyVasectomy

Identifiers

PMID40467868
PMCPMC12893908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.