ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026
Contemporary approaches and treatment perspectives for chronic scrotal content pain: insights from a national practice patterns survey of reproductive urologists.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ejaculation-sparing endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- [Vasectomy reversal : Literature review].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Review
- Vasectomy at a crossroads: utilization, equity, and clinical practice in a changing reproductive landscape.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Vasectomy revisited: Safe procedure in a changing reproductive landscape.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Aquablation versus AEEP for BPH: technique, outcomes, and the evolving surgical landscape - an EAU endourology perspective.World journal of urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 25-item electronic survey was circulated to reproductive urologists from around the US to evaluate current national diagnostic and therapeutic practices for the management of chronic scrotal content pain (CSCP). Questions addressed physician demographics, referral patterns, diagnostic protocols, treatment approaches, and outcome perceptions. Forty-one of 183 (22.4%) invited participants completed the survey. Among ten conservative treatment options, reassurance (41.5%) and NSAIDs (31.7%) were most frequently ranked first, while opioid medications were the least preferred, with 56.1% of respondents ranking them last of the ten options. Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord was the most commonly utilized surgical procedure overall (95.1%) and the first choice for post-vasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS) in 63.0% of respondents. Vasectomy reversal was the surgery of choice for PVPS in only 22.0% of respondents. Respondents perceived higher complete symptom resolution (median: 75% vs. 25%) and lower failure rates (median: 10% vs. 20%) in patients who had surgery versus those who had only conservative measures. Only 7.3% of participants reported using validated assessment tools such as the Chronic Orchialgia Symptom Index. These results demonstrate that wide variability persists in CSCP management among reproductive urologists, though there is consensus that surgery has a higher success rate as compared to conservative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.