Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467863›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2025

Formation of an expanding memory representation in the hippocampus.

Sachin P Vaidya, Guanchun Li, Raymond A Chitwood, Yiding Li, Jeffrey C Magee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Behavioral Timescale Synaptic Plasticity: A Burst in the Field of Learning and Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  13. Stability through plasticity: Finding robust memories through representational drift.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Behavioral Timing of Interictal Spikes, But Not Rate, Correlates with Impaired Working Memory Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sachin P VaidyaHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Guanchun LiHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5209-0525
Raymond A ChitwoodHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Yiding LiHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5176-0814
Jeffrey C MageeHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. jcmagee@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-9347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How brain networks connected by labile synapses store new information without catastrophically overwriting previous memories remains poorly understood. To examine this, we tracked the same population of hippocampal CA1 place cells (PCs) as mice learned a task for 7 days. We found evidence of memory formation as both the number of PCs maintaining a stable place field and the stability of individual PCs progressively increased across the week until most of the representation was composed of long-term stable PCs. The stable PCs disproportionately represented task-related learned information, were retrieved earlier within a behavioral session and showed a strong correlation with behavioral performance. Both the initial formation of PCs and their retrieval on subsequent days were accompanied by prominent signs of behavioral timescale synaptic plasticity (BTSP), suggesting that even stable PCs were re-formed by synaptic plasticity each session. Further experimental evidence supported by a cascade-type state model indicates that CA1 PCs increase their stability each day they are active, eventually forming a highly stable population. The results suggest that CA1 memory is implemented by an increase in the likelihood of new neuron-specific synaptic plasticity, as opposed to extensive long-term synaptic weight stabilization.

Indexed as

CA1 Region, HippocampalMemoryPlace CellsAnimalsMiceNerve NetNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID40467863
PMCPMC12229897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.