ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2025
[Nutritional therapy in ophthalmology-patients' interest and motivation].
Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral therapeutic diets are known for ophthalmologic diseases. Therefore, the present study evaluates the interest of our patients in healthy and therapeutic nutrition.
methodsIn all, 100 representative patients answered a structured interview questionnaire about their nutrition behavior and interest in therapeutic diet for their ophthalmologic diseases. Data from our patient files were correlated with their answers.
resultsOver 70% of the patient were interested in and followed a healthy diet and ate fruits and vegetables daily. Only one third had fish weekly. Two thirds showed high interest in therapeutic diet, especially patients of higher age and with the diagnoses sicca, age related macular degeneration (AMD) and glaucoma. There was no correlation of nutrition interest with the patient sex, disease stage, presence of diabetes or need for intravitreal drug administration. In all, 60% agreed to pay for the consultation, albeit rather low amounts. Greater interest and adherence to a healthy diet but not sex, higher age or stages of disease correlated with the willingness pay.
conclusionOur patients who were surveyed had high interest in nutritional therapy for ophthalmologic diseases, and were also theoretically motivated to implement it. Patients with sicca, glaucoma and AMD were more motivated; however this was not related to the stage of their disease. Most patients are willing to only pay small amounts for the consultation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40467849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.