ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning models for predicting severe acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis-induced myocardial injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital acute kidney injury in patients with lung cancer complicated with sepsis: clinical and nursing applications.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Review
- Association between the platelet-to-albumin ratio and 28-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with Pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study and predictive model establishment based on machine learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Development of machine learning models for predicting postoperative hyperglycemia in non-diabetic gastric cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe acute kidney injury (sAKI) is a prevalent and serious complication among patients with sepsis-induced myocardial injury (SIMI). Prompt and early prediction of sAKI has an important role in timely intervention, ultimately improving the patients' survival rate. This study aimed to establish machine learning models to predict sAKI via thorough analysis of data derived from electronic medical records. The data of eligible patients were retrospectively collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (MIMIC-IV database) from 2008 to 2019. A total of 1,467 patients with SIMI were included and the primary outcome was the development of sAKI within 7 days after intensive care unit admission. Nine predictive variables were selected and further used to establish the machine learning models. Five different machine learning models were established. The random forest model yielded the most accurate predictions with the highest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.81) and accuracy (0.79), while the AUC of the traditional SOFA model is 0.66, with an accuracy of 0.71. The machine learning models can be effective tools for predicting the risk of sAKI in patients with SIMI and the RF model performed best.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.