Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467843›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning models for predicting severe acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis-induced myocardial injury.

Te Mi, Xuelin Li, Qizhan Fang, Mingchen Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Te Mi *Department of Intensive Care Unit, Jining No. 1 Peoples' Hospital, Jining, 272011, Shandong, China.
Xuelin Li *Department of Intensive Care Unit, Jining No. 1 Peoples' Hospital, Jining, 272011, Shandong, China.
Qizhan FangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Jining No. 1 Peoples' Hospital, Jining, 272011, Shandong, China.
Mingchen FengDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Jining No. 1 Peoples' Hospital, Jining, 272011, Shandong, China. sdjnfmch@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute kidney injury (sAKI) is a prevalent and serious complication among patients with sepsis-induced myocardial injury (SIMI). Prompt and early prediction of sAKI has an important role in timely intervention, ultimately improving the patients' survival rate. This study aimed to establish machine learning models to predict sAKI via thorough analysis of data derived from electronic medical records. The data of eligible patients were retrospectively collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (MIMIC-IV database) from 2008 to 2019. A total of 1,467 patients with SIMI were included and the primary outcome was the development of sAKI within 7 days after intensive care unit admission. Nine predictive variables were selected and further used to establish the machine learning models. Five different machine learning models were established. The random forest model yielded the most accurate predictions with the highest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.81) and accuracy (0.79), while the AUC of the traditional SOFA model is 0.66, with an accuracy of 0.71. The machine learning models can be effective tools for predicting the risk of sAKI in patients with SIMI and the RF model performed best.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCardiomyopathiesMachine LearningSepsisAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveMachine learningMimic-IV databaseSepsis-induced myocardial injurySevere acute kidney injury

Identifiers

PMID40467843
PMCPMC12137613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.