Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467841›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2025

The spatial and temporal activation of macrophages during fibrosis.

Jacques Behmoaras, Kevin Mulder, Florent Ginhoux, Enrico Petretto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Macrophages in embryonic development.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacques BehmoarasProgramme in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. jacquesb@duke-nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5170-2606
Kevin MulderGustave Roussy Cancer Campus, INSERM, Team Myeloid Cell Development, Villejuif, France.
Florent GinhouxGustave Roussy Cancer Campus, INSERM, Team Myeloid Cell Development, Villejuif, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2857-7755
Enrico PetrettoProgramme in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-5921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages are active participants of tissue repair and when normal repair processes fail, fibrosis can ensue, which leads to major organ dysfunction and affects nearly a billion people worldwide. Here we focus on macrophages in the spatiotemporal control of fibrosis, drawing on our understanding of the roles of these cells in organogenesis, adult organ homeostasis and wound repair. We describe recent insights from single-cell transcriptomics studies of human and mouse tissues that reveal macrophage heterogeneity in healthy and fibrotic niches, as well as the pathways underlying macrophage-fibroblast cooperation during progression from inflammation to fibrosis. Finally, we propose a model to explain how macrophage activity over time and across different tissues controls tissue fibrosis, we discuss therapeutic initiatives based on regulation of macrophage activity and we recommend future research directions.

Indexed as

FibrosisMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesAnimalsFibroblastsHumansInflammationMiceWound Healing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.