ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization and induction effect evaluation of complex inducer of Aquilaria sinensis based on factorial design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Agarwood is a kind of valuable traditional Chinese medicine. However, natural agarwood has a long formation cycle and is in short supply. Herein, the complex inducer of artificial agarwood was screened and optimised based on design of experiments (DoE). Single factor design experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of different concentrations of methyl jasmonate (A-MeJA), formic acid (B-FA) and Botryosphaeria rhodina A13(C-A13) on the in vitro branches of A. sinensis at different induction times (D-Time). The 2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.