ArticleCommunications biology2025
Dietary microbiota-mediated shifts in gut microbial ecology and pathogen interactions in giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant Panda Feces-DerivedVeterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Dietary Changes Are Associated with Seasonal Restructuring of the Gut Microbiome inMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Fertility-Associated Soil Chemistry Predominantly Influence Gut Microbiota Diversity in Goitered Gazelles of the Qaidam Basin, China.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms of bamboo-derived miRNA-mediated gene regulation and dietary adaptation in giant pandas.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Lignocellulose degradation capabilities and distribution of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in Clostridium from the gut of giant pandas.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Coordinated Transcriptomic and Epigenetic Approach Reveals Molecular Features Underlying Natural Mating Ability in Captive Male Giant Pandas.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of dietary microorganisms on host microbiota is recognized, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study examined the effects of bamboo surface microbiota, including virulence factors, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and mobile genetic elements from different bamboo parts (leaves, shoots, and culms), on giant panda gut microbiota using three pairs of twins. Results showed that bamboo and fecal samples shared 1670 microbial species, with shoot surface microbiota contributing the highest proportion (21%, Bayesian source tracking) of contemporaneous gut microbiota, primarily by increasing abundances of Escherichia coli and ARGs. Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella enterica also showed high co-occurrence in both bamboo and fecal samples, indicating potential colonization. Additionally, Streptococcus suis, Acinetobacter, and Mycobacterium progressively declined in fecal samples as bamboo shoot intake increased, suggesting these microbes are likely transient. The findings emphasize the impact of foodborne microorganisms on the host and the importance of conservation management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.