ArticleScientific reports2025
Retrospective stratified analysis of resistance mechanisms to anti-EGFR therapy in mCRC using tumor tissue samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- KRAS in Colorectal Cancer: Tumorigenesis, Surgical Implications and Evolving Treatment Target.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Exploratory biomarker analysis of RAS/BRAF somatic mutations and gene expression signatures for predicting treatment effects of aflibercept in the velour trial.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of acquired resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), with a focus on the role of KRAS secondary mutations. We sought to evaluate how these mutations contribute to resistance in patients treated with chemotherapy alone or in combination with cetuximab, and to explore the impact of treatment duration and disease progression on mutation rates. We retrospectively collected data from 50 mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS who received either chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR therapy (cetuximab). Following treatment, tumor samples were recollected through surgery, biopsy, or colonoscopy. The secondary mutation status of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF was determined via an amplification refractory mutation system. Based on the nature of the chemotherapy regimen and the presence or absence of tumor progression at the time of the second KRAS mutation analysis, patients were stratified into three groups: Group A (adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence), Group B (first-line chemotherapy without progression), and Group C (first-line chemotherapy with progression). Secondary KRAS mutations were assessed in relation to therapeutic regimens and progression profiles to investigate the mechanisms of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. The overall rate of secondary KRAS mutations was 6.0% (3/50). These mutations were not observed in patients treated with chemotherapy alone (0/24), but occurred in 11.5% (3/26) of patients receiving chemotherapy combined with cetuximab. Stratification by treatment regimens and tumor progression showed mutation rates of 0% (0/13) in Group A, 0% (0/16) in Group B, and 14.3% (3/21) in Group C. In Group C, the mutation rate rose from 0% (0/5) in patients receiving chemotherapy alone to 18.8% (3/16) in those receiving combination therapy. Furthermore, in patients receiving chemotherapy combined with cetuximab of Group B and Group C, longer anti-EGFR treatment duration was associated with a higher mutation rate: 5.9% (1/17) in those treated for ≤ 10 months versus 25.0% (2/8) in those treated for > 10 months. Including one case of secondary BRAF mutation, the cumulative mutation rate reached 37.5% (3/8) in patients with prolonged cetuximab exposure. This study innovatively revealed from multiple perspectives that the crucial role of secondary KRAS mutations in the resistance of mCRC patients to EGFR therapy, emphasizes the importance of continuous genomic monitoring, and provides new ideas for future combination targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.