ArticleScientific reports2025
Systemic immune response alteration in patients with severe pressure ulcers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and ADAMTS-5 in an acute ischemia/reperfusion-induced pressure ulcer model, a pilot exploratory animal study.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Inflammation and wound healing: a comprehensive overview of mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and translational perspectives.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Integrative Genomics Reveals Causal Pleiotropy and Therapeutic Opportunities at the Interface of Acute Pancreatitis and Infection.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2026Article
- Aloe-derived micellar emulsion dressing combination therapy for pressure ulcers: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2026Article
- Serum CitH3 and TSLP as predictive biomarkers for impaired wound healing after bascom cleft lift surgery in pilonidal sinus disease: a nomogram-based risk model.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Comprehensive Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analysis of Severe Pressure Ulcer Patients Identifies Molecular Signatures Associated with Impaired T Cell Function.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Preventing pressure injuries in individuals with impaired mobility: Best practices and future directions.Journal of surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is a dynamic process involving tissue formation, debris removal and ultimately remodeling to restore skin integrity. Although wound healing is generally successful, this process can eventually fail, leading to chronic wounds like pressure ulcers (PUs), whose presence/absence has been considered by WHO as good indicator of patient's wellbeing and care quality. PUs are stratified into grades I to IV grades based on their severity, however, the existence of systemic markers predicting their clinical progression remains unexplored. Here, we performed a serum proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of 54 patients with PUs ranging from grade II to grade III-IV. Unsupervised clustering identified a distinctive immune-related proteomic and transcriptomic blood profile in high-grade PUs. Specifically, pathways controlled by inflammatory-linked genes such as IER3, TSLP, and TNFAIP6 (TSG-6) were found to be upregulated in high-grade PUs, together with a reduction in the levels of potent immunomodulators such as IL-10, IFNγ, MCP-2/CCL8, and CXCL-10 in serum from grade III-IV PUs patients. All together, indicating an altered inflammatory state in advanced PUs. This study provides novel insights regarding the use of omic approaches to find potential systemic biomarkers for the prediction of severity in PUs and could help to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the chronic progression of this pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.