ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploratory factor analysis on the development and validation of the understanding, attitude, practice and health literacy questionnaire on COVID-19 in Malay language.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Subphenotypes and Short-Term Outcomes in PICU Patients Receiving Continuous Blood Purification.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Development and psychometric testing of a parental knowledge, attitude, and practices questionnaire on pentavalent vaccine safety.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Spiritual emptiness and depression among university students: the roles of perceived support and age.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Mechanisms influencing Chinese senior faculty's intention to engage in volunteer teaching and policy implications.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Veterinarians' attitudes, knowledge, and practices about antibiotic use in animals: questionnaire design and reliability.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus known as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To effectively assess understanding, attitudes, practices, and health literacy regarding COVID-19, a valid and reliable questionnaire needs to be developed. Therefore, this study aims to develop and validate the Understanding, Attitude, Practice and Health Literacy Questionnaire on COVID-19 (MUAPH C-19) in Malay Language. A cross-sectional study was conducted across three hospitals in Klang Valley from June 20, 2022, to June 30, 2022. The study's target population consisted of Malaysian citizens aged 18 years and older who attended the three hospitals. A systematic random sampling method was employed to select participants. The original MUAPHQ C-19 questionnaire consists of four domains: understanding (12 items), attitude (15 items), practice (11 items), and Health Literacy (12 items). The validity of the questionnaire was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and interclass correlation. A factor loading threshold of 0.50 was set. A Cronbach's alpha value greater than 0.6 was considered acceptable. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value greater than 0.75 indicated good reliability. A total of 100 respondents participated in the study. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy ranged from 0.691 to 0.899, and Bartlett's Test of Sphericity was significant across all domains, indicating sufficient sample adequacy for the EFA. An eigenvalue greater than 1.0 revealed two components in the understanding domain (41.308-68.250%), three components in the attitude domain (22.802-58.973%), four components in the practice domain (19.852-73.500%), and a single component in the health literacy domain (64.194%). In the reliability assessment, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.677 to 0.914, while the intraclass correlation ranged from 0.562 to 0.759 across all domains, demonstrating a good and reliable scale. Finally, 10 items have been deleted, and 10 sub-domains have emerged across four domains. This study successfully developed a valid and reliable tool of the 42-item MUAPHQ C-19 for measuring understanding, attitudes, practice and health literacy related to COVID-19 among the general public in Malaysia. Future studies utilizing the MUAPHQ C-19 can be conducted nationwide to monitor public literacy and behaviours regarding COVID-19 and to assess the effectiveness of prevention and control programs implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.