ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting breast self-examination awareness in Sub-Saharan Africa using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast self-examination is a very cost-reducing approach that significantly decreases the cost burdens associated with medical equipment, fees of healthcare practitioners, transportation to health facilities, and other indirect costs. Furthermore, it raises accessibility to health services and is significant in averting the transmission of infectious illnesses in low- and middle-income countries, constituting a sustainable channel for gains in public health. We employed a total weight of 133,425 from the Demographic and Health Survey using STATA Version 17, MS Excel 2016, and Python 3.10 for data management. Additionally, Min-Max scaling and standard scaling were used for variable scaling, along with Recursive Feature Elimination for feature selection. The data was split in an 80:20 ratio for training and testing, and balanced using Tomek Links combined with Random Over-Sampling. The model performance was evaluated by ROC-AUC, AUC, accuracy, F1 score, recall, and precision. The Decision Tree model was the best-performing one, with an accuracy of 82% and an AUC of 0.87. The reason for this superior performance is its capacity to accurately represent non-linear associations and interactions in the data, which were difficult for more conventional models like logistic regression to do. Woman's age, smartphone availability, marital status, health facility visits, HIV testing, number of children, examination by healthcare providers, wealth status, place of residence, mother's occupation, education level, social media use, health status, and distance to health facilities predictors of breast self-examination. In conclusion, Decision Tree is the top-performing model with an AUC and accuracy of 87% and 82%, respectively, due to its ability to capture non-linear relationships between predictors and the target variable, use ensemble averaging and random feature selection to reduce variance and overfitting, and its inherent feature importance mechanism that keeps it robust to irrelevant features. Based on this study finding, to increase awareness of breast self-examination (BSE), we recommend, Create awareness for community leaders about breast cancer and the benefits of self-examination, deploying mobile health clinics and outreach programs, Training health extension workers on proper BSE to share with the community, additionally, launching radio/television campaigns in local languages to disseminate information for large audience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.