Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467695›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning based rapid X-ray fluorescence signal extraction and image reconstruction for preclinical benchtop X-ray fluorescence computed tomography applications.

Amrit Kaphle, Sandun Jayarathna, Sang Hyun Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amrit KaphleDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Sandun JayarathnaDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Sang Hyun ChoDepartment of Radiation Physics, Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. scho@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Rational translation of gold nanoparticle mediated radiosensitization tothe clinicR01CA257241 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Sang Hyun Cho, Sunil Krishnan · 2021 to 2026
$3.1M
In situ cancer cell specific biomineralization to overcome nanoparticle delivery barriers and sensitize pancreatic cancer to radiotherapyR01CA274415 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Sang Hyun Cho, Sunil Krishnan · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257241NCI NIH HHS R01 CA274415NIH HHS R01CA257241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research advances have resulted in an experimental benchtop X-ray fluorescence computed tomography (XFCT) system that likely meets the imaging dose/scan time constraints for benchtop XFCT imaging of live mice injected with gold nanoparticles (GNPs). For routine in vivo benchtop XFCT imaging, however, additional challenges, most notably the need for rapid/near-real-time handling of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) signal extraction and XFCT image reconstruction, must be successfully addressed. Here we propose a novel end-to-end deep learning (DL) framework that integrates a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN) for rapid XRF signal extraction with a U-Net model for XFCT image reconstruction. We trained the models using a comprehensive dataset including experimentally-acquired and augmented XRF/scatter photon spectra from various GNP concentrations and imaging scenarios, including phantom and synthetic mouse models. The DL framework demonstrated exceptional performance in both tasks. The 1D CNN achieved a high coefficient-of-determination (R² > 0.9885) and a low mean-absolute-error (MAE < 0.6248) in XRF signal extraction. The U-Net model achieved an average structural-similarity-index-measure (SSIM) of 0.9791 and a peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of 39.11 in XFCT image reconstruction, closely matching ground truth images. Notably, the DL approach (vs. the conventional approach) reduced the total post-processing time per slice from approximately 6 min to just 1.25 s.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsGoldMetal NanoparticlesMiceNeural Networks, ComputerPhantoms, ImagingGold

Identifiers

PMID40467695
PMCPMC12137812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.