Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467692›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

H

Somayeh Zonoubi, Mohammad Barati, Mohammad Ghanbari, Masood Hamadanian

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Somayeh ZonoubiDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.
Mohammad BaratiDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran. barati.m@kashanu.ac.ir.
Mohammad GhanbariDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.
Masood HamadanianDepartment of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of Chlorella vulgaris bio-oil as a renewable energy source was evaluated in a supercritical fluid mixture as both a hydrogen donor and solvent, with and without the Pd-Ni/γ-Al₂O₃ nanocatalyst. Firstly, RSM was carried out to improve long-chain hydrocarbons (LCHs) production process in a hydrogen-less supercritical n-hexane medium using dry biomass of Chlorella vulgaris. Then, the reaction was run under optimal conditions, which included isopropanol, temperature, feedstock, and reaction time of 10%V/V, 250 °C, 0.1 g, and 20 min, with the Pd-Ni catalyst with different Pd: Ni ratios. FTIR, XRD, BET, and TEM were the methods used to characterize the catalysts. More than 47% of the final product, in the absence of the catalysts, was made up of LCHs (C

Indexed as

Aluminum OxideBiomassChlorella vulgarisMetal NanoparticlesMicroalgaeNickelPalladiumBiofuelsCatalysisHydrogenAluminum OxideBiofuelsHydrogenNickelPalladium

Identifiers

PMID40467692
PMCPMC12137704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.