Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467683›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Automated interpretation of cardiotocography using deep learning in a nationwide multicenter study.

Chang Eun Park, Byungjin Choi, Rae Woong Park, Dong Wook Kwak, Hyun Sun Ko, Won Joon Seong, Hyun-Hwa Cha, Hyun Mi Kim, Jisun Lee, Hyun-Joo Seol and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Chang Eun Park *Department of Convergence Healthcare Medicine, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Byungjin Choi *Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Rae Woong ParkDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Dong Wook KwakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Sun KoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won Joon SeongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Hwa ChaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Mi KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jisun LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Joo SeolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seungyeon PyeonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soon-Cheol HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yun Dan KangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dankook University, School of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Joon OhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Joong Shin ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Nam KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Young Ah KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Ha KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Gwang Jun KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Miran KimDepartment of Convergence Healthcare Medicine, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea. kmr5300@ajou.ac.kr.
Hye Jin ChangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea. zzanga-94@hanmail.net.

Funding

Bio-convergence Technology Education Program (KIAT) (Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy) P0017805Korea Health Technology R&D Project (KHIDI) (Ministry of Health and Welfare, MOHW) RS-2023-00266038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely detection of abnormal cardiotocography (CTG) during labor plays a crucial role in enhancing fetal prognosis. Recent research has explored the use of deep learning for CTG interpretation, most studies rely on small, localized datasets or focus on outcomes less relevant to clinical practice. To address these limitations, we developed a clinically applicable model using a large-scale, nationwide CTG dataset with reliable annotations provided by a board-certified obstetrician. Our study utilized 22,522 deliveries from 14 hospitals, each including cardiotocography (CTG) recordings of up to 75 min in length. The CTG signals were segmented into 5-minute intervals, resulting in a total of 519,800 person-minutes of analyzed data. We trained and validated a deep learning model based on CTG segments for classifying normal and abnormal CTGs. In the independent test dataset, the model achieved an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.880 and PRC (area under the precision-recall curve) of 0.625 in internal tests. External tests across three datasets achieved AUCs of 0.862, 0.895, and 0.862 and PRCs of 0.553, 0.615, and 0.601. Our study results show the potential of the deep learning for automated CTG interpretation. We will evaluate this model in future prospective studies to assess the model's clinical applicability.

Indexed as

CardiotocographyDeep LearningArea Under CurveFemaleHeart Rate, FetalHumansPregnancyROC CurveCardiotocographyDeep learning modelFetal monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40467683
PMCPMC12137656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.