ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning for workpiece mass prediction using real and synthetic acoustic data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Magnetic Cellulose Nanocrystal Composites: Synthesis, Properties, Applications, and Opportunities.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We apply a feedforward neural network using supervised learning to sound recordings obtained without specialised equipment as workpieces undergo a simple manufacturing process to predict their mass. We also report a simple technique to seed synthetic from real data for training and testing the algorithm. Work was performed in the frequency domain, with spectrally-resolved magnitudes fed as variables (or features) to the network. The mean absolute percentage deviation when predicting the mass of each of thirty-two workpieces of different material composition considering just real data was 19.2%. This fell to 8.7%, however, when the exercise was repeated making use of a significantly greater amount of these synthetic data to train and test it. Fractional uncertainty in measured mass is of the order of 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.