ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimal graph representations and neural networks for multichannel time series data in seizure phase classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Predicting epileptic seizures based on a multi-convolution fusion network].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, several machine-learning (ML) solutions have been proposed to solve the problems of seizure detection, seizure phase classification, seizure prediction, and seizure onset zone (SOZ) localization, achieving excellent performance with accuracy levels above 95%. However, none of these solutions has been fully deployed in clinical settings. The primary reason has been a lack of trust from clinicians towards the complex decision-making operability of ML. More recently, research efforts have focused on systematized and generalizable frameworks of ML models that are clinician-friendly. In this paper, we propose a generalizable pipeline that leverages graph representation data structures as a flexible tool for graph neural networks. Moreover, we conducted an analysis of graph neural networks (GNN), a paradigm of artificial neural networks optimized to operate on graph-structured data, as a framework to classify seizure phases (preictal vs. ictal vs. postictal) from intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) data. We employed two multi-center international datasets, comprising 23 and 16 patients and 5 and 7 h of iEEG recordings. We evaluated four GNN models, with the highest performance achieving a seizure phase classification accuracy of 97%, demonstrating its potential for clinical application. Moreover, we show that by leveraging t-SNE, a statistical method for visualizing high-dimensional data, we can analyze how GNN's influence the iEEG and graph representation embedding space. We also discuss the scientific implications of our findings and provide insights into future research directions for enhancing the generalizability of ML models in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.