ArticleScientific reports2025
Microclimate-driven strategies for thermally comfortable university open spaces in cold regions of China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
University open spaces are predominantly utilized by students, with outdoor thermal comfort on campus significantly enhancing their physical and mental well-being. This study investigates the thermal perceptions (sensation, comfort, and acceptability) of students at a university in Xi'an, China, employing meteorological measurements, questionnaires, and activity logs. The Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) was utilized to establish a thermal baseline. We documented the spatiotemporal distribution of students in open spaces and analyzed the correlation between their thermal perceptions and environmental factors. Furthermore, an optimal design strategy for campus open spaces, tailored to students' needs and based on meteorological data, attendance patterns, and thermal perceptions, is proposed. Key findings include: (1) Globe temperature (Tg) and wind speed (Va), which are the primary meteorological determinants of college students' thermal sensation, with relative humidity (RH) playing a secondary role. (2) Variations in Neutral Physiological Equivalent Temperature (NPET) and its range (NPETR) are observed across different open spaces, indicating distinct thermal experiences. The NPET at Entrance Square (ES) is 17.3 °C, NPETR is 13.3-21.4 °C; the NPET at Leisure Garden (LG) is 21.8 °C, NPETR is 16.4-27.3 °C; the NPET at Life Square (LS) is 21 °C, NPETR is 15.9-26 °C; the NPET at Cultural Square (CS) is 18 °C, NPETR is 11.6-24.7 °C. (3) The utilization of campus open spaces by college students is significantly influenced by the outdoor microclimate, available facilities, and spatial configurations, leading to diverse behavioral adaptations for thermal regulation. (4) Incorporating students' physical, physiological, and psychological preferences, the study proposes an optimal design strategy for enhancing the thermal comfort in campus open spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.