Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467611›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Anisotropic persistent random walk model simulates T-cells migration over curved landscapes.

Gildas Carlin, Ian Manifacier, Dang Khoa Cao, Laurent Pieuchot, Valeriy Luchnikov, Jean-Louis Milan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gildas CarlinAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France. gildas.carlin@univ-amu.fr.
Ian ManifacierAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Dang Khoa CaoUniversité de Haute-Alsace, CNRS, IS2M UMR 7361, F-68100, Mulhouse, France.
Laurent PieuchotUniversité de Haute-Alsace, CNRS, IS2M UMR 7361, F-68100, Mulhouse, France.
Valeriy LuchnikovUniversité de Haute-Alsace, CNRS, IS2M UMR 7361, F-68100, Mulhouse, France.
Jean-Louis MilanAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France. jean-louis.milan@univ-amu.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche MovingCells 22-CE45-0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration is an important cellular process to study, as it plays a fundamental role in tissue structuring and development, while abnormal cell migration may be the cause of certain diseases. Among the known factors influencing cell migration, substrate curvature is one, with cells naturally moving towards concave areas while avoiding convex ones. The underlying causes of migration guidance by curvature remain unclear, and in particular, the way in which cell persistence is affected is still not well understood. We introduce an anisotropic persistent random walk model which includes cell heterogeneity to simulate T-cell migration across various corrugate landscapes. We compared the trajectories generated by the model with in vitro T-cells trajectories over the same topographies. The model accurately captures key features of cell trajectories on flat surfaces as well as on curved surfaces, such as a directional bias toward concave regions. The model also reveals a superdiffusive behavior on curvature, demonstrating more efficient movement compared to flat surfaces. The anisotropic randomness incorporated in the model appears as a critical feature which shapes T-cells persistence mechanisms by increasing cellular activity in the axis of concave valleys and promoting migration towards concave areas.

Indexed as

Cell MovementModels, BiologicalT-LymphocytesAnisotropyComputer SimulationHumansCell migrationCurvatureCurvotaxisIn silico model

Identifiers

PMID40467611
PMCPMC12137650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.