ArticleScientific reports2025
Powdery mildew resistance prediction in Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L) with emphasis on machine learning approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic enhancement of root, tuber and cereal crops via pangenomics, multi-omics integration and AI-driven prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By employing machine-learning models, this study utilizes agronomical and molecular features to predict powdery mildew disease resistance in Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L). A 130-line F8-F9 barley population caused Badia and Kavir to grow at the Gonbad Kavous University Research Farm on three planting dates (19 November, 19 January, and 19 March), with three replicates in 2018/2019 and 2019/2020. The study employed RReliefF, MRMR, and F-Test feature selection algorithms to identify essential phenotype traits and molecular markers. Subsequently, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Neural Network, and Gaussian Process Regression models were compared using MAE, RMSE, and R2 metrics. The Bayesian algorithm was utilized to optimize the parameters of the machine-learning models. The results indicated that the Neural Network model accurately predicted powdery mildew disease resistance in barley lines. The evaluation based on high R2 values, as well as low MAE and RMSE, highlighted the efficacy of these models in identifying significant phenotype traits and molecular markers associated with disease resistance. The findings demonstrate machine learning models' potential in accurately predicting powdery mildew disease resistance in Barley. The neural network model specifically showed excellent results in this area because it managed to identify critical phenotypic traits and molecular markers very well. This research highlights the importance of combining AI with molecular markers for improved disease resistance and other desirable crop traits during plant breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.