ArticleNature communications2025
Reduction of SEM charging artefacts in native cryogenic biological samples.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond structure: spectroscopic imaging in cryogenic electron microscopy.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of frozen-hydrated biological samples allows imaging of subcellular structures at the mesoscale in a representation of their native state. Combined with focused ion beam milling (FIB), serial FIB/SEM can be used to build a 3-dimensional model of cells and tissues. The correlation of specific regions of interest with cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) can additionally enable subsequent high-resolution analysis. However, the use of serial FIB/SEM imaging-based methods is often limited due to charging artefacts arising from insulating areas of cryogenically preserved samples. Here, we demonstrate the use of interleaved scanning to attenuate these artefacts, allowing the observation of biological features that otherwise would be masked or distorted. We apply our method to samples where inherent features were not visible using conventional scanning. These examples include membrane contact sites within mammalian cells, visualisation of the degradation compartment in the algae E. gracilis and observation of a network of membranes within different types of axons in an adult mouse cortex. The proposed alternative scanning method could also be applied to imaging other non-conductive specimens in SEM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.