ArticleScientific reports2025
Monogamy removes constraints on reproductive tissue investment imposed by intense sexual selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of storage conditions on oxidative stress biomarkers: methodological implications for ecological and evolutionary studies.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key factor influencing the reproductive success and fitness of an individual is the allocation of resources to reproductive tissue. Previous research has documented positive influences of sexual selection on the evolution of male traits such as testes size. However, few studies have focused on whether sexual selection shapes overall reproductive tissue investment patterns, and even fewer have studied it in both males and females. Furthermore, whether the ecological/demographic context modulates these effects is not known. We used experimental evolution on an insect model system to assess the independent and interactive effects of sexual selection intensity (intense [polygamy] vs. relaxed [monogamy]) and metapopulation structure (absent vs. present) on reproductive tissue investment in both sexes. Counterintuitively, we found that both males and females evolving under monogamy had higher relative reproductive tissue investment than individuals evolving under polygamy. We found no independent effect of metapopulation structure or any interactive effect with sexual selection on reproductive tissue investment of either sex. Our findings suggest that trade-offs between pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection may constrain reproductive tissue investment under intense sexual selection, and that selection under monogamy removes this constraint. Generally, our study underscores the complexities underpinning the evolution of reproductive allocation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.