ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2025
Understanding patient perceptions, knowledge, and experience of perioperative allergic reactions: a qualitative interview study.
Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLife-threatening allergic reactions can occur during surgery and anaesthesia. Patients' perceptions, knowledge, and experience of these events are largely unreported. Better understanding of patient perspectives might influence the design of future treatment pathways.
methodsAdult patients (≥18 yr) referred to the Yorkshire Perioperative Allergy Clinic for investigation were invited to semi-structured interviews 1 week before and 1 week after their clinic visit. Patients were recruited until thematic saturation was achieved. Codebook thematic analysis of transcripts was conducted in a continuous, iterative process.
resultsWe recruited 11 patients (22 interviews). We identified four key themes: (1) impact of being 'absent' (unconscious) during the reaction; (2) implications of the allergic reaction for the patient; (3) understanding of allergy and allergy testing; (4) perception of vulnerability during future surgery. For many, being 'absent' made it harder to process the event; for others this was protective. Many developed a profound sense of vulnerability affecting daily life. Other health concerns interacted with and modified the impact of the event. Understanding of allergy was generally poor; several patients had inaccurate recall of their diagnosis. Despite anxiety about future surgery, patients often appeared ambivalent about the need to tell healthcare professionals about their diagnosis, believing 'the system' would act on their behalf.
conclusionsPerioperative allergic events cause persistent anxiety, significantly impacting quality of life. Misunderstanding around the allergy diagnosis and its implications exposes patients to substantial risk during future surgery. There is a need for greater patient awareness to reduce this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.