Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467318›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Women's perspectives of decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative antenatal-postnatal paired interview study.

Erin White, Anna Davies, Andrew Demetri, Sheelagh McGuinness, Gemma Clayton, Abigail Fraser, Sonia Barnfield, Danya Bakhbakhi, Emma Claire Anderson, Katherine Birchenall and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Should We Communicate Information Regarding Birth Choices to Women?: An Online Randomised Survey.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Informing Decision-Making About Caesarean Birth: A Delphi Study to Develop a Core Information Set.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Erin WhiteDepartment of Women's & Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Anna DaviesUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-6547
Andrew DemetriUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sheelagh McGuinnessUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gemma ClaytonUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9525-2758
Abigail FraserUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sonia BarnfieldDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Danya BakhbakhiUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-5069
Emma Claire AndersonUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Katherine BirchenallUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rachel MillerN/A, Patient Representative, Bristol, UK.
Christy BurdenUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Abi MerrielDepartment of Women's & Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0352-2106
Carol KingdonDepartment of Women's & Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK ckingdon@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-9257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand and compare women's antenatal and postnatal views on: (1) priorities for information provided about labour and delivery and (2) decision-making in labour and delivery.

designQualitative interview study using repeat interviews at two time points: during pregnancy (≥13 weeks gestation); and after birth (≥6 weeks).

settingLarge maternity hospital in the Southwest of England.

participantsPregnant women accessing antenatal care were purposively sampled and recruited antenatally by community midwives to ensure representation from different sociodemographic groups, with diverse experiences of low and high-risk care. DATA COLLECTION: Telephone interviews with a single researcher using a semistructured interview topic guide. DATA ANALYSIS: Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke's six-stage process.

resultsTwelve women participated (12 antenatal interviews; 10 follow-up postnatal interviews). Overall, women's postnatal views were consistent with their antenatal views about what they wanted to know and the factors that influence decision-making. Three themes were generated. Theme 1 'Sources of information' presents evidence of how women obtain and use information (sub-themes: 'social influences', 'patient responsibility for information seeking', 'NHS vs non-NHS resources'). Theme 2 reports women's views and experiences of 'The influence of Healthcare Professionals in decision-making' (sub-themes 'patient and professional roles in decision-making', 'conflicting advice and preferences', 'taking authority in emergency decision-making'). The final theme, theme 3, 'When, how, and what information women want' shows women want time to process information (sub-themes 'when: it's definitely information and time', 'how: presentation of information', 'what: information required'). Cross-cutting all themes, we found an unmet need for information to be tailored to the individual.

conclusionsWomen understand decision-making during labour and birth is a dynamic process. Women can struggle with the volume, quality and timing of information available. In busy maternity settings, the challenge is to better equip women with the information they want, and health professionals with the information they need to provide for personalised care and shared decision-making. Antenatal interventions that warrant further research include decision aids, birth plans, and structured counselling using core information sets. Insights from both antenatal and postnatal perspectives will help inform their development.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDelivery, ObstetricLabor, ObstetricParturitionPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareAdultEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung AdultDecision MakingNatural ChildbirthPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40467318
PMCPMC12142090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.