Observational studyBMJ open2025
Timing of mechanical ventilation and its association with in-hospital outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a multicentre observational study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phenotyping cardiogenic shock: an insight from the gulf cardiogenic shock registry.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the association between the timing of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) initiation and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) secondary to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
designRetrospective analysis of a multicentre registry.
settingData were obtained from the Gulf-Cardiogenic Shock registry, which includes hospitals across six countries in the Middle East.
participants1117 patients diagnosed with STEMI and CS. Of these, 672 (60%) required MV and were included in this analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of baseline characteristics, Society of Coronary Angiogram and Intervention (SCAI) shock stage, and clinical parameters among groups based on time to MV.
resultsParticipants were categorised by time from shock diagnosis to MV: early (≤15 min), intermediate (30 min) and late (≥60 min). Median times were 15 min (IQR 10-20), 30 min (IQR 25-35) and 60 min (IQR 45-70), respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. Increased delay in MV was associated with a higher mortality risk during the first 60 min post-diagnosis, beyond which the risk plateaued. Delayed MV was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.38, p<0.001).
conclusionsEarly initiation of MV in patients with STEMI complicated by CS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality. These findings highlight the importance of timely respiratory support, warranting further investigation in prospective or randomised controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.