Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467292›Full record

Trial reportActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2025

Video Versus Face-To-Face Preoperative Anaesthetic Assessment: The VIDFACE Trial-A Statistical Analysis Plan.

Sofie Amalie Bosholdt, Moritz Kilian German Denneborg, Oscar Rosenkrantz, Morten Hylander Møller, Janus C Jakobsen, Markus Harboe Olsen, Andreas Møgelmose, Rasmus T Hesselfeldt, Katrine B Buggeskov

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06765538 (Video Versus Face-to-face Preoperative Anaesthetic Assessment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06765538 narecruitingnot on this map

Video Versus Face-to-face Preoperative Anaesthetic Assessment: a Randomized Clinical Trial on Safety and User Satisfaction

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2024 to 2026Enrolled2,260ConditionsAnesthesia, TelemedicineArmsVideo consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sofie Amalie BosholdtDepartment of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopedics - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0002-7270-9505
Moritz Kilian German DenneborgDepartment of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopedics - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0008-8270-6176
Oscar RosenkrantzDepartment of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopedics - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1050-0792
Morten Hylander MøllerDepartment of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6378-9673
Janus C JakobsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3642-2120
Markus Harboe OlsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0981-0723
Andreas MøgelmoseVisual Analysis and Perception Lab, Aalborg University, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0328-382X
Rasmus T HesselfeldtDepartment of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopedics - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0007-5193-0717
Katrine B BuggeskovDepartment of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopedics - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3455-1655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe video versus face-to-face preoperative anaesthetic assessment (VIDFACE) trial is a randomised, multicentre, two-arm, superiority, assessor- and data analyst blinded clinical trial. The routine use of preoperative assessments is accepted as the gold standard for elective surgery, reducing both morbidity and mortality. In recent years, video-based assessments have been investigated with a focus on patient satisfaction and enhancing efficacy. The VIDFACE trial aims to compare video-based preoperative anaesthetic assessment with face-to-face assessments, with a focus on patient safety and satisfaction.

objectiveTo report the statistical analysis plan for the VIDFACE randomised clinical trial. METHODS/

designWe will enrol 2260 adult participants undergoing elective ear-nose-throat or oral and maxillofacial surgery. Participants will be randomised 1:1 stratified by 'trial site' and 'known or suspected malignant/haematological condition' to either intervention (video-based preoperative anaesthetic assessment) or control (face-to-face preoperative anaesthetic assessment). Two blinded statisticians will analyse the data. Before unblinding, we will write two abstracts based on the initial blinded analysis, one assuming A is intervention and B is control and one with the opposite assumption. Primary outcome is a composite outcome including five predefined serious complications. We assume a 30% relative risk reduction of the primary composite outcome. An interim analysis will take place after inclusion and follow-up on half of the intended sample size.

conclusionThis statistical analysis plan of the VIDFACE trial will minimise analysis bias and add transparency to the statistics applied in the results of the trial.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06765538.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaPreoperative CareVideo RecordingAdultData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansPatient SatisfactionanaesthesiaDenmarkpreoperative assessmentstatisticstelemedicinevirtual care

Identifiers

PMID40467292
PMCPMC12136927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.